Skip to main content

Creating API with MVC ApiController part 2

In my previous post I wrote about first steps in creating Rest-full API by using ApiController. Now it`s time to make next step and go a little bit dipper inside web services created in MVC. In this post I want to describe two very important aspect:
  • creating a real life scenario for web service implementation of POCO entity
  • extend presented scenario and make it asynchronous
To complete this tutorial one more class is needed. This class is a simple fake of some database which  is wrapper around a very few collections and allow all CRUD operation. Moreover the implementation of this fake database uses a singleton design pattern to prevent creating instance of it each time and maintain state between web service calls.

Code Snippet
  1. /// <summary>
  2.         /// Represents a fake database.
  3.         /// </summary>
  4.         public sealed class FakeDbContext
  5.         {
  6.             private static volatile FakeDbContext instance;
  7.             private static object syncRoot = new Object();
  8.  
  9.             private FakeDbContext()
  10.             {
  11.                 this.Users = new List<User>();
  12.                 this.Dictionary = new Dictionary<string, string>();
  13.             }
  14.  
  15.             public static FakeDbContext Instance
  16.             {
  17.                 get
  18.                 {
  19.                     if (instance == null)
  20.                     {
  21.                         lock (syncRoot)
  22.                         {
  23.                             if (instance == null)
  24.                                 instance = new FakeDbContext();
  25.                         }
  26.                     }
  27.  
  28.                     return instance;
  29.                 }
  30.             }
  31.  
  32.             public List<User> Users { get; set; }
  33.  
  34.             public Dictionary<string, string> Dictionary { get; set; }
  35.         }

The real life scenario that we want to implement is a simple web service which expose all CRUD operation and of course it`s base on REST. In the following class each API functions return the same type HttpResponseMessage which represent a standard HTTP response. This type contains two important properties: StatusCode - which represent a  HTTP response status code and Content - which store body of the response if any. The the easiest to produce a HttpResponseMessage is calling one of many build-in functions which are responsible for creating a fully qualified response based on several input parameter:
Code Snippet
  1. /// <summary>
  2.         /// Represent a controller for managing <see cref="User"/>.
  3.         /// </summary>
  4.         public class UserController : ApiController
  5.         {
  6.             public UserController()
  7.             {
  8.                 if (!FakeDbContext.Instance.Users.Any())
  9.                 {
  10.                     FakeDbContext.Instance.Users = new List<User>()
  11.                 {
  12.                     new  User(){ Id = 1, FirstName = "Roberto", LastName="Carlos", Email="robi_carlo@gmail.com"},
  13.                     new  User(){ Id = 2, FirstName = "Zinédine", LastName="Zidane", Email="zizu@live.com"},
  14.                     new  User(){ Id = 2, FirstName = "Peter", LastName="Schmeichel", Email="scheisse@yahoo.com"},
  15.                 };
  16.                 }
  17.             }
  18.  
  19.             // GET api/person
  20.             [HttpGet]
  21.             public HttpResponseMessage Get()
  22.             {
  23.                 return Request.CreateResponse<ReadOnlyCollection<User>>(HttpStatusCode.OK, FakeDbContext.Instance.Users.AsReadOnly());
  24.             }
  25.  
  26.             // GET api/person/5
  27.             [HttpGet]
  28.             public HttpResponseMessage Get(int id)
  29.             {
  30.                 var resultUser = FakeDbContext.Instance.Users.FirstOrDefault(u => u.Id == id);
  31.                 if (resultUser == null)
  32.                 {
  33.                     return Request.CreateErrorResponse(HttpStatusCode.NotFound, "User dones`t exists.");
  34.                 }
  35.  
  36.                 return Request.CreateResponse<User>(HttpStatusCode.OK, resultUser);
  37.             }
  38.  
  39.             // POST api/person
  40.             [HttpPost]
  41.             public HttpResponseMessage Post(User value)
  42.             {
  43.                 if (value == null)
  44.                 {
  45.                     return Request.CreateErrorResponse(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest, "Null User object.");
  46.                 }
  47.  
  48.                 // Checking user already exists in a list.
  49.                 if (FakeDbContext.Instance.Users.Contains(value))
  50.                 {
  51.                     return Request.CreateErrorResponse(HttpStatusCode.Conflict, "User already exists.");
  52.                 }
  53.                 else
  54.                 {
  55.                     FakeDbContext.Instance.Users.Add(value);
  56.                 }
  57.  
  58.                 return Request.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.Created);
  59.             }
  60.  
  61.             // PUT api/person/5
  62.             [HttpPut]
  63.             public HttpResponseMessage Put(int id, [FromBody] User value)
  64.             {
  65.                 if (value == null)
  66.                 {
  67.                     return Request.CreateErrorResponse(HttpStatusCode.BadRequest, "Null User object.");
  68.                 }
  69.  
  70.                 if (!FakeDbContext.Instance.Users.Any(u => u.Id == id))
  71.                 {
  72.                     return Request.CreateErrorResponse(HttpStatusCode.NotFound, "User dones`t exists.");
  73.                 }
  74.                 else
  75.                 {
  76.                     FakeDbContext.Instance.Users.Remove(value);
  77.                     FakeDbContext.Instance.Users.Add(value);
  78.                 }
  79.  
  80.                 return Request.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.OK);
  81.             }
  82.  
  83.             // DELETE api/person/5
  84.             [HttpDelete]
  85.             public HttpResponseMessage Delete(int id)
  86.             {
  87.                 var personToDelete = FakeDbContext.Instance.Users.FirstOrDefault(u => u.Id == id);
  88.                 if (personToDelete == null)
  89.                 {
  90.                     return Request.CreateErrorResponse(HttpStatusCode.NotFound, "User dones`t exists.");
  91.                 }
  92.                 else
  93.                 {
  94.                     FakeDbContext.Instance.Users.Remove(personToDelete);
  95.                 }
  96.  
  97.                 return Request.CreateResponse(HttpStatusCode.OK);
  98.             }
  99.         }

Now our service is ready to use and we run it and we can call each GET, POST, PUT and DELETE function by using any of HTTP Client.

Picture 1. Calling GET and POST API  from test HTTP Client.
Whole source code of the project is available here.

 Thank you.
Location: Dublin, Ireland

Popular posts from this blog

Persisting Enum in database with Entity Framework

Problem statement We all want to write clean code and follow best coding practices. This all engineers 'North Star' goal which in many cases can not be easily achievable because of many potential difficulties with converting our ideas/good practices into working solutions.  One of an example I recently came across was about using ASP.NET Core and Entity Framework 5 to store Enum values in a relational database (like Azure SQL). Why is this a problem you might ask... and my answer here is that you want to work with Enum types in your code but persist an integer in your databases. You can think about in that way. Why we use data types at all when everything could be just a string which is getting converted into a desirable type when needed. This 'all-string' approach is of course a huge anti-pattern and a bad practice for many reasons with few being: degraded performance, increased storage space, increased code duplication.  Pre-requirements 1. Status enum type definition...
more -->

Using Newtonsoft serializer in CosmosDB client

Problem In some scenarios engineers might want to use a custom JSON serializer for documents stored in CosmosDB.  Solution In CosmosDBV3 .NET Core API, when creating an instance of  CosmosClient one of optional setting in  CosmosClientOptions is to specify an instance of a Serializer . This serializer must be JSON based and be of  CosmosSerializer type. This means that if a custom serializer is needed this should inherit from CosmosSerializer abstract class and override its two methods for serializing and deserializing of an object. The challenge is that both methods from  CosmosSerializer are stream based and therefore might be not as easy to implement as engineers used to assume - still not super complex.  For demonstration purpose as or my custom serializer I'm going to use Netwonsoft.JSON library. Firstly a new type is needed and this must inherit from  CosmosSerializer.  using  Microsoft.Azure.Cosmos; using  Newtonsoft.Json; usin...
more -->

Multithread processing of the SqlDataReader - Producer/Consumer design pattern

In today post I want to describe how to optimize usage of a ADO.NET SqlDataReader class by using multi-threading. To present that lets me introduce a problem that I will try to solve.  Scenario : In a project we decided to move all data from a multiple databases to one data warehouse. It will be a good few terabytes of data or even more. Data transfer will be done by using a custom importer program. Problem : After implementing a database agnostic logic of generating and executing a query I realized that I can retrieve data from source databases faster that I can upload them to big data store through HTTP client -importer program. In other words, data reader is capable of reading data faster then I can process it an upload to my big data lake. Solution : As a solution for solving this problem I would like to propose one of a multi-thread design pattern called Producer/Consumer . In general this pattern consists of a two main classes where: Producer class is res...
more -->